Journeys with Autism

As you might have gathered from my last post, I’ve been feeling a lot of internal pressure to explain myself to the outside world.

Pressure is not necessarily a bad thing, so long as it’s ultimately empowering. When I email someone at the school for the Deaf about volunteering, taking a class, or getting advice on how to navigate the hearing world, my drive to explain my sensitivities is all for the good. I’m advocating for myself. I’m making sure that people understand what I can do, what I cannot do, and what I need in order to keep myself healthy. Yes, it can be quite exhausting, and it can also make me feel very vulnerable, but that’s often the cost of self-advocacy, and I accept it.

But then there’s the pressure that doesn’t result in empowerment. This kind of pressure comes from my need to be understood for its own sake. Nothing is wrong with my need for others to understand me. It’s basic to being a human being. Why else do I write this blog, if not to be understood? Why else do autistic people read it, if not to feel comforted that someone else understands?

However, a significant problem arises when I go about my everyday life and expect that if I use enough words, everyone will understand. How is a stranger on the street going to understand the experience of being flooded by everyday sounds? How can even my husband know what that feels like? Unless they share the same experience, they can’t really know. They will always be understanding it from the outside in, rather than from the inside out. The best I can hope for is that others believe what I’m saying, that they respect what I’m saying, and that they support me.

So, I’ve been thinking a lot about my drive for self-advocacy on the one hand, and my insistence on tilting at windmills, on the other. Tilting at windmills is out of the question right now; I need every bit of energy I can get just to function well. But the drive for self-advocacy is itself taking a lot out of me, and I’ve been wondering why. What I’ve come to realize is that being autistic is essentially the experience of living in paradox, and that this experience makes self-advocacy very, very difficult for me. I’ll list (of course!) the paradoxes that have been occurring to me lately. Feel free to add ones I haven’t thought of.

1. I have acutely sensitive hearing—so acute that I have to use ear protection to get as close to being deaf as possible. So, can I hear or not? When someone asks me, I don’t have a ready answer.  What does it mean to hear, anyway? Does it just have to do with sound waves entering my brain? Or is it about whether those sound waves get filtered, prioritized, and understood? If the former, then yes, I can hear. If the latter, then no, I can’t hear.

2. I am capable of talking a blue streak, but because I am unable to follow the spoken word for very long or respond to it effectively, I find myself lapsing more and more into silence. So, can I speak or not? If speaking means being able to form words and string them together, then yes, I can speak. If speaking means being consistently able to keep up with a conversation so as to understand the meaning of the speaker and to respond in a purposeful way, then no, I can’t speak. 

3. I deeply want to be part of a community, but being autistic means that wherever I am, I am usually alone.

4. I deeply want to help people, but being around people is often impossible.

5. When I write, I know whether I’m making sense, but when I speak, I often have no idea whether I’m saying anything in a coherent manner.

6. I have difficulty sequencing tasks in time, but I have no problem ordering the things of space or perceiving visual patterns.

7. I have retained a kind of childlike innocence, and yet I feel old, pessimistic, and deeply sad when I look at the suffering of the world.

8. I do not read nonverbal cues intuitively, and yet when I walk into a room full of people, I can feel what everyone is feeling without anyone explicitly telling me.

9. I do not believe that I have a disorder, and yet I am unable to do things that most people take for granted.

10. I engage people as though what they say is what they mean, even though I have ample life experience to lead me to the opposite conclusion.

When it comes down to it, the problem of self-advocacy may simply be a problem of language. For autistic people, what it means to see, hear, smell, touch, taste, move through space, relate to other people, form friendships, and be successful is often fundamentally different from what it means to our more typical friends. When others lack this understanding, they can (and usually do) consider autism to be inferior to other modes of experience. I know that I am not inferior to other people, and yet I also know that when I say that I am autistic, many people will either a) assume that I am missing the essential pieces that make one human or b) consider me some sort of amazing anomaly because of my capacity for love and sensitivity. I know that when I block sound and refuse to speak (despite having superb hearing and a capacity to ramble on endlessly), many people will think I am simply being stubborn or perverse. And so, in order to give people an understanding of my needs and my experience, I can’t simply use words like autism, hear, or speak and let their normative, neuro-typical meanings stand. I feel compelled to explain what I mean as an autistic person.

These acts of translation are tiring, and yet, they feel like such important work that I don’t quite know how to manage them. The best I can do, at present, is to choose carefully the time and place in which I engage in translation at all. If I am advocating for myself, fine. I’ll translate and do my best (within the limits of my neurology) to keep it as concise as possible. But if I’m simply trying to enlighten someone who would just as soon go home for dinner, I’m wasting my time.

I must make these distinctions. If I don’t, I won’t have any energy left to do the things that I enjoy.

© 2009 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg