Archive for November 28, 2011

The Perfect Answer


Why do you stay in the marriage?

An acquaintance recently asked my husband this question. He asked it not because my husband had expressed any unhappiness with our marriage, but because I have Asperger’s.

How do I begin to explain all the ways in which this question hurts?

Let’s start with the assumption that my husband must be unhappy in our marriage, despite the fact that we are both quite delighted to be married to each other. It’s rather common for disabled people to hear others make that assumption. It’s an assumption based on the notion that disabled people are a trial and a tribulation to those who love us. So I knew, at that moment, that I wasn’t alone. It was somewhat comforting to know I wasn’t alone, but mostly, it was very painful to know that I wasn’t alone, and that so many of us still go through these experiences.

And then, there is a stereotype at work here, an assumption that people with Asperger’s are all alike, and that we make relationships difficult simply by virtue of being autistic. Somehow, when one partner has Asperger’s, generalizations replace specifics, and the idea that relationships are a two-way street, in which each party can be a challenge to the other, gets lost.

While I was still reeling from having heard the question, only one answer came to mind, and it was the answer I was hoping my husband had given:

Because I love her.

It’s not the one he gave. I was disappointed at first. When someone implies something negative about me, I immediately go to the place of wanting my husband to profess his love for me, in a very loud and declamatory voice, from the nearest rooftop.

But now I’m glad he didn’t give that answer. Simply saying that he loves me runs the risk of implying that he stays in the marriage not because of what I bring, but out of something akin to heroism. It ignores the ways in which I ground his life, in which I nourish his heart, in which I support him in all of his struggles. It has the potential to reinforce the notion that, because of my disability, I am a burden that he carries with saintly patience. And it suggests that he should have to profess his love for me, rather it simply being a given, as it should be for any husband and wife.

So he didn’t say he loved me. Instead, this is what he said:

Because it works for me.

It’s a brilliant answer. It really is. It takes the entire conversation out of the realm of disability and into the realm of why anyone stays in a marriage. You stay because it works for you. It may be hard work sometimes, and it may be a rocky road sometimes, but that’s marriage. Certainly, you also stay because you love the other person, but that’s not enough to keep a marriage going. Lots of people who love each other break up because the marriage stops working for one or both of them, and because there is nothing that anyone can do to fix it.

So yes, my husband is married to me because it works for him. And I am married to him because it works for me. Each of us can be a trial to the other at times, but the same is true for any two married people. We are not married despite the challenges each of us puts in the path of the other, but because of them. They help us to grow, to love, and to understand life in ways that we could never begin to do without the other.

© 2011 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Share

Almost Better Than Chocolate

Check this out:

http://thingsorganizedneatly.tumblr.com/

Heaven!

Seeking Support

It’s taken me awhile to put this post together. I’ve been aware of my need for support for some time, but I hadn’t been sure exactly how to ask for it, or what it might consist of. This post is an attempt to explore the question.

As many of you know, engaging the whole issue of autism and empathy can be very painful. I see the unexamined assumptions. I see the rampant generalizing. I feel the impact of the dehumanizing words. I feel the anger and sadness as I face how deeply entrenched the stereotypes are. And I see the potential for harm.

Many people have told me that they can hardly bear to look at the sources that I analyze and write about in detail. I understand why you feel that way, believe me. It is hard, hard work. As I prepare to enter more deeply into the work in my graduate program, I am feeling more and more apprehensive about delving into the research and critiquing it. My apprehension has been looming very large lately, and I’ve been trying to understand why it’s there. What I’ve realized is that my apprehension is not only about the content of what I’ll be reading, but also about feeling that I am fighting this fight on my own.

Don’t get me wrong: I know, intellectually, that I am not alone. I know how many people support this work. I know how many people share my sadness and anger. I know how many people value what I’m doing. I deeply appreciate all the many supportive comments and messages I’ve received. Every single one of them has great meaning for me.

But what I’m lacking is a support network — a place where I can go and get support when I’m feeling burdened, or upset, or just plain depressed at what I’m seeing. I’ve been thinking about what that might look like, and I’ve come up with two ideas.

First, with the full support of my professors, I’ve decided to immerse myself in disability theory and disability studies before reading any more research into autism and empathy, theory of mind, and other related topics. I have to put together a working framework with which to analyze what I’m looking at, and I need to feel myself part of a larger community of people who have grappled with all the same issues I’m grappling with — issues of dehumanization, exclusion, and power. When it comes down to it, although the details differ, all disabled people who write about disability issues have to struggle with a social context that has historically sought to exclude them. As I’ve begun reading the work of disability theorists and writers, I’ve begun to see patterns emerging that give me new ways of looking at own work. I’m hoping that if I immerse myself enough, I’ll emerge with a framework that will allow me to understand the larger social and historical forces at work, and that this framework will provide a structure into which I can channel my sadness, my anger, my frustration, and my passion for change.

Second — and this is where you all come in — I want to set up a network of people I can email when I’m feeling up against it. Sometimes, I’ll be able to channel my feelings into a theoretical framework, but at other times, I will just need to process my feelings and get support. I’ve got some friends in town who help me do that, but I want to feel myself part of a much larger community of support, because this work is so much bigger than just a few of us.

I’m aware that I’m doing a lot of heavy lifting on these issues, and by saying that, I’m not complaining about it. I chose to do this work, and it’s my passion, and I don’t feel forced into it by anyone else’s expectations but my own. But heavy lifting is heavy lifting, and at times, I need help carrying the burden. I think it’s wise to ask for that support at the outset, because if I don’t, I risk running on fumes at some point, and that’s not a place I want to go. I want to continue to be filled with strength and energy and power for this work, not arrive at a place in which my resources for it are depleted.

Fighting dehumanization is too important. I am in this fight for the long haul, and I want it to remain a sustainable one. To do that, I need to reach out. So, if you’d be interested in being on a list of people I can email for support when the going gets tough, please leave a comment below or send me an email. And by all means, feel free to drop me a note if you like what I’m doing and it’s meaningful to you. Those kinds of messages mean more to me than any words can say.

© 2011 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Share

When Medications Do Harm

S-O-S Best of the Best (BoB) is a collection of bloggers who come together once a month to write on one topic pertaining to “invisible” special needs, including ADHD, autism, anxiety, sensory processing disorder, and mental illness. I was asked to contribute a post for this month’s topic on the use of medications. The following excerpt from my new book, Blazing My Trail: Living and Thriving with Autism, discusses my experience of taking Lorazepam, a benzodiazepine, and the healing I’ve found since withdrawing from the medication.


My Experience with Lorazepam

“The biggest drug-addiction problem in the world doesn’t involve heroin, cocaine, or marijuana. In fact, it doesn’t involve an illegal drug at all. The world’s biggest drug-addiction problem is posed by a group of drugs, the benzodiazepines, which are widely prescribed by doctors and taken by countless millions of perfectly ordinary people around the world.”   — Vernon Coleman

In February of 2005, to treat an increase in my level of anxiety, my primary care doctor prescribed a medication called Lorazepam. Little did I know that taking this drug would send me on a years-long journey of coping with ever-increasing depression, fear, loss of functioning, and social isolation.

Fortunately, in 2010, I changed course and began walking a new road. I engaged in the process of learning about how the medication had affected my life, and I went through the ordeal of weaning off it. As a result, my high level of functioning, my independence, and my zest for life have all returned.

Medication Withdrawal and Other Delights
From early 2005 until early 2009, I took one 0.5 mg tablet of Lorazepam upon awakening in the morning and another before going to sleep at night. After I had been on the medication for four years, another doctor increased the dosage to 0.5 mg in the morning and 1.0 mg at night. By early 2010, I was taking 2.0 mg per day. A third doctor also put me on Zoloft (an SSRI) and Topamax (for migraine prevention), in addition to Lorazepam and Amitriptyline (a tricyclic antidepressant).

By the spring of 2010, I had begun to realize that the medications, far from helping me, were making it increasingly difficult to manage my life. I was crying almost every day and I was nearly housebound. So I began the process of weaning off all of them — without medical supervision. My primary care doctor had fired me from her practice after I asked for accommodations for my disability, and it took me over a month to find another doctor who would accommodate me and guide me through the weaning process.

Meanwhile, I was on my own.

Tapering off Zoloft, Topamax, and Amitriptyline posed no problem whatsoever. Quitting Lorazepam, however, was another story. After attempting to withdraw from Lorazepam by decreasing my dosage by 0.5 mg per week, I suffered an acute reaction. I began to
have a tremendous amount of anxiety, and my sleep worsened. After I stopped taking the medication altogether, I hardly slept for two nights. I was sweating through my clothes. I was crying and frightened. I was in so much physical pain that it was almost unbearable. I felt as though my body and mind were coming apart. I found myself pacing up and down the floors of our house saying, “Misery, misery, misery.” Without a physician to consult, I couldn’t understand why the withdrawal was having this impact.

With nowhere else to turn, I went online and looked up information on how to taper off Lorazepam without pushing myself to the edge of sanity. When I did, I found out that it’s a benzodiazepine and a tranquilizer. In other words, it’s in the same category as Valium and Librium, and it’s highly addictive. In fact, in 1975, the U.S. Department of Justice demanded that benzodiazepines be classified as schedule IV drugs under the Controlled Substances Act.

And yet, this medication had been prescribed for me by three different doctors — even after I had told them, in no uncertain terms, that I absolutely did not want to take anything narcotic or addictive. What part of that statement did they not understand? Or did they just not know what Lorazepam does?

As I soon found out, I was not alone in suffering acute withdrawal symptoms. According to Professor Malcolm Lader, member of the UK Committee on the Review of Medicines, Lorazepam is a particularly difficult drug to withdraw from. “When somebody comes into my office and says that they’ve been trying to stop their Lorazepam,” he said, “my heart sinks, because I know I shall have twice as much of a problem as getting them off, say, Valium. The symptoms are more severe, they’re more persistent, more bizarre, and people are much more distressed by them.” (Ashton, “A Problem”)

In my online travels, I found a support site for people seeking to withdraw safely from benzodiazepines — and I learned that, when done properly, the process takes six to 12 months. So, in early May of 2010, I put myself on a stabilization dose of 1.5 mg per day, and I found myself able to sleep and to tolerate being in my body again. After three weeks, I began tapering very slowly, cutting my dosage by very small decrements, until I finally finished my taper, under the care of a new primary care doctor, eight months later.

Suffice it to say that, even over the course of a slow taper, the withdrawal process was brutal. Every time I made a cut in my dosage, I experienced extreme amounts of muscle pain, insomnia, anxiety, depression, and exhaustion. I was determined to rid Lorazepam from my body, though, and by the grace of God, I have.

But the havoc this medication wrought over the years I took it is, unfortunately, an all-too-common effect of benzodiazepines.

Daily Interdose Withdrawals
Lorazepam is a short half-life benzodiazepine. On average, the dose reaches its peak blood levels in about seven to eight hours. As I came to understand how quickly the concentration of the drug in my bloodstream was falling each day, my experience of the previous four years started to come into focus. Because I had been taking the medication only in the morning and in the evening, I had been going through interdose withdrawals on a daily basis, with all the same symptoms that would attend my eight-month taper.

That’s right: I had been having withdrawal symptoms every single day for four years. No one had ever warned me about how the medication worked, so I couldn’t figure out why I was on such a physical and emotional rollercoaster ride. Nothing in my life seemed to account for it, and the only response from my prescribing doctors was to increase my dosage.

These increases did not work. In addition to the impact of falling blood concentrations, daily withdrawal symptoms occur because of the tolerance that the body develops, very quickly, to the drug itself. As Dr. C. Heather Ashton writes in Benzodiazepines: How They Work and How to Withdraw, these drugs “lose much of their efficacy because of the development of tolerance. When tolerance develops, ‘withdrawal’ symptoms can appear even though the user continues to take the drug.” (Chapter II)

Because they quickly become ineffective and trigger daily withdrawal symptoms, benzodiazepines cause a host of problems, many of which they were intended to manage. In early 2009, after four years of benzodiazepine use, I exhibited difficulties common to benzodiazepine users. I was crying on a regular basis. I was falling into a depression unlike anything I had ever experienced. My anxiety was nearly paralyzing. And I had become almost housebound. The outside world felt overwhelming, and going out triggered both fear and exhaustion.

All of these symptoms amount to a textbook case of the impact of benzodiazepines. In her research, Dr. Ashton determined that people who use these drugs become ill with a number of psychiatric conditions. “Many patients,” she writes, “find that anxiety symptoms gradually increase over the years despite continuous benzodiazepine use, and panic attacks and agoraphobia may appear for the first time after years of chronic use.” She adds that long-term benzodiazepine use can cause depression in people with no history of it and can aggravate depression in people already suffering from it. (ibid, Chapter I)

Heightened Sensory Sensitivity
As a person with autism, I found that all of the symptoms that attend benzodiazepine use were exacerbated by the impact of interdose withdrawals on my sensory functioning.

By early 2009, I was more sensory sensitive than I had ever been in my life. Sometimes, my skin felt like tissue paper; at other times, loud noises were enough to send me into physical pain that took me days to recover from. Light seemed very bright, and I began wearing sunglasses, even on winter days. I became overwhelmed by this sudden severe spike in sensitivity, and every foray into the outside world took all the courage and energy I could muster. My level of functioning decreased significantly. Most days, I just stayed home. I couldn’t figure out what was happening.

Then, I read Dr. Ashton’s findings on benzodiazepine withdrawal and sensory sensitivity. She notes that “a characteristic feature of benzodiazepine withdrawal is a heightened sensitivity to all sensations — hearing, sight, touch, taste and smell. When extreme, these sensations can be disturbing.” She describes one woman needing to stop all the clocks in her house because their ticking seemed unbearably loud. Others have had to wear dark glasses because ordinary light seemed “dazzlingly bright.” (ibid, Chapter III) I’d finally found an answer to the question of why my sensory sensitivities had increased so dramatically in a relatively short period of time: the daily interdose withdrawals were sending my already acutely sensitive system into overdrive.

After four years of benzodiazepine use, I could barely socialize at all. I felt very isolated and I suffered from severe levels of stress that were lowering my levels of functioning. As I learned about the havoc that these drugs wreak, I considered myself lucky to be tapering off them before they stole any more years from my life.

Recovering from Benzodiazepines
The good news is that my functioning and my quality of life have improved dramatically since withdrawing from Lorazepam. Just halfway through a difficult taper, I found my mind becoming clearer and my mood lifting. I felt more physically and emotionally resilient than I had in years.

As my taper progressed, I began to feel alive again. I still had my sensory-sensitive “I don’t want to go anywhere” days, but even on those days, I forced myself to go out for a walk, just to keep intact my connection to the world. In so doing, to my great surprise, I found my connection to the world not limited to human beings, but to all of creation. I began to walk and appreciate the trees, the colors, the breeze blowing — even the humid weather of a New England summer. I carried my camera with me everywhere and I took pictures that enabled me to see hidden things, simple things, beautiful things that I’d never registered before. Suddenly, the world became a fascinating place. Ultimately, I entered three of my best photos in a local contest, won second prize, and had the pleasure of seeing my work displayed in town with that of other photographers.

Since I’ve withdrawn from the medication entirely, the positive effects have only increased, and my sensory sensitivities have quieted down appreciably. I go out every day, in any weather, even in winter. I’ve made new friends and rekindled relationships with old ones. The depression and agoraphobia are both entirely gone, and my high levels of functioning and independence have returned.

My experience is not unique. In 1991, Karl Rickels, a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, reported that patients who had gotten off benzodiazepines were doing “significantly” better than those who had failed to do so. A few years later, he found that after long-term users withdrew from benzodiazepines, they “became more alert, more relaxed, and less anxious, and this change was accompanied by improved psychomotor functions.” (Whitaker, 136-137)

As for Dr. Ashton, she found that agoraphobia in her patients disappeared within a year of withdrawal, even in patients who had been housebound. Furthermore, most users experienced a dramatic increase in quality of life after withdrawal:

“Clinical experience shows that most long-term benzodiazepine users actually feel better after coming off the drugs. Many users have remarked that it was not until they came off their drugs that they realised they had been operating below par for all the years they had been taking them. It was as though a net curtain or veil had been lifted from their eyes: slowly, sometimes suddenly, colours became brighter, grass greener, mind clearer, fears vanished, mood lifted, and physical vigour returned.” (ibid, Chapter II)

When I was on benzodiazepines, my emotions were scattered, my sensory sensitivities were through the roof, and I found it difficult to think clearly. Since I’ve stopped taking them, my emotions have become much more moderate, positive, and under my control; my sensory sensitivities have become much more manageable; my thoughts have become sharper by the day; and, best of all, my passion for living has returned.

References

Ashton, C. Heather. “Benzodiazepines: How They Work and How to Withdraw.” benzo.org.uk. August 2002, revised. Accessed 21 June 2011. http://www.benzo.org.uk/manual/

—-. “A Problem with Lorazepam?” benzo.org.uk. 1988. Accessed 21 June 2011. http://www.benzo.org.uk/ashloraz.htm

Coleman, Vernon. Life without Tranquillisers. Large print ed. Bath, England: Chivers, 1990.

Whitaker, Robert. Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America. New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 2010.

© 2011 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Guest Post: Are We Prey Animals?

This wonderful guest post is by Charli Devnet, a woman with Asperger’s, who wrote the piece for Autistics Speaking Day. I am honored to repost it here.

—-

Three weeks ago, I attended a series of lectures in Albany, New York by Dr. Tony Attwood on high-functioning autism and Asperger’s Syndrome. Among the many insights I gained, one observation really struck a chord. Dr. Attwood commented that Aspies are like prey animals. I had been pondering that very issue myself.

Last summer, I was riding Silverado out on the trails when the thought first occurred to me. I adopted Silverado two years ago after my parents died, when the loneliness became unbearable. He is an undocumented immigrant, a former worker on a Mexican cattle ranch. At 14.1 hands, the vet calls him a large pony. Everyone else refers to him as the small grey horse.

Despite the stories you hear, there was no instant bonding between us. I had ridden most of my life, yet I had no idea of the responsibility and the cost involved in actually owning a horse. There are board fees and vet fees and farrier fees and, of course, all that tack that must be purchased. We’ve also had trouble finding a barn where we fit in. In little more than two years, we’ve been at three barns, and now I’m looking for a fourth. There have been many times when I wondered what I was thinking, acquiring a horse. Yet, as time has gone by, we have bonded, and Silverado has taught me many things that are as true of myself as they are of him.

You see, a horse really is a prey animal. He spooks at the least little thing — a thunderstorm, a backfire, an animal as innocuous as a deer. A deer will run across his path, and he’ll spook and, if I were not there to pull on the reins, he would turn and run away.

At first I would reprimand him. “Silly horse, to be frightened by a deer!” Then I began to see things from his point of view. Silverado catastrophizes. “Sure,” he thinks, “it looks like a deer, but what if she’s a mountain lion in disguise, trying to lure me into a false sense of security, and all the while planning to lap on my back and devour me? Better flee now and ask questions later.”

Haven’t I become just the same way? There was a time when I did not act like a prey animal. As a child, I was strong and spunky and high-functioning. I had troubles enough, to be sure: schoolyard bullies who chased me down the street, classmates who mocked and taunted me, teachers who treated me with undue harshness in the belief that so bright a child — so bright a girl — should know better than to misbehave as consistently as I did. But I did not think of myself as a victim. Whatever problems I had, I was tough enough to confront them.

Of course, as a child, I had what experts now refer to as a support system. Although I did not fit in with many of the other kids, I had my circle of playmates and, indeed, a best friend just next door. If my parents were not the best of nurturers, it did not matter. In my hometown, I had a plethora of aunts and uncles and grandparents who took up the slack. Further, like most children in the sixties, I was accorded a measure of freedom that few kids enjoy today. If I left home in the morning and came back for dinner, it was not thought amiss. I spent my free time carousing with my playmates, in the library pursuing my favorite subjects, just exploring on my bike or perusing the latest comic books in the What-Not Shop. (My favorite was Superboy. Like me, he came from the planet Krypton).

The summer I turned thirteen, I lost all that. My parents sold our house and moved to a crumbling estate in the country. Suddenly, I had no one to play with, no one to talk to, and nothing to do. I still had my bike, but there was nowhere to go. From that time on, loneliness began to track me and would never let me out of its icy clutches.

Loneliness made me vulnerable. It disabled me. If I were a male, I would say it emasculated me. It was then that I began to think of myself as a victim and, internalizing that notion, acted as a victim.

How else to explain why, despite several advanced degrees, I have been unemployed much of my adult life, or settled for a series of part-time jobs, for all of which I was overqualified and underpaid? How else to explain a life of unwanted solitude or uneasy celibacy? The only skill a prey animal has to master is how to sniff out danger and run away. Of all the skills I had as a child, the one I honed was that. Other people thought I lacked suitable work or relationships because I was lazy, too picky, or simply did not try hard enough. In reality, it was the highly tuned instinct of a prey animal frightened of living in captivity.

Although I excelled at being a prey animal, I was not a happy one, and I suspect that most Aspies are unhappy in the victim role to which the world has relegated them. True prey animals in the wild have the solace of the herd, and that is the one comfort that autistics most sorely lack. We are usually loners and not always by choice. The true loners of the animal kingdom — the cat, the owl, the wolf — are hunters, not prey. I wonder if that is the reason behind the rapport that most Aspies have with felines. We like cats because they embody qualities we wish we could incorporate into ourselves: that overwhelming self-confidence, that devil-may-care insouciance, the cat’s security in its ability to take care of itself, its wit to design a plan and the patience to pursue it.

When I was younger, I alleviated some of my sense of victimization by engaging in some cat-like behavior. I became what other people might call a “stalker.” Now, I never meant to harm anyone; I had no bad intentions. I was excited by the thrill of the chase. Lying in wait or following stealthily empowered me. It provided the temporary illusion that I was the one in control, the decision-maker; in other words, the person I had been before I realized that I was a prey animal. On the contrary, when a man approached me, I reverted to form and ran away. In the end, I turned St. Paul’s admonition on its head. I decided it was better to burn than to marry. At least burning made me feel alive and free.

My mother, who might well have been an Aspie herself, had a similar concept. She rarely ate and, as a consequence, was amazingly slender. I asked her how she kept so thin. She replied that she liked “that hungry feeling.” It took me a long time to understand the theory, but now I do. I guess it made her feel alive in a world of strangers, one aspect of life that she alone could control. Of course, in order to retain “that hungry feeling” and refrain from doing what comes naturally, something must be sacrificed. My mother sacrificed her physical health. She smoked to suppress her appetite. When she developed lung cancer at the age of 74, she had no strength to fight and succumbed very quickly.

As for me, I gave up all that I might have had in life had I not surrendered myself to the flight instinct of a prey, had I had the courage or the pride in myself to stand up to trouble instead of spooking and running away.

Share

On Disclosure, or Why I Was Quiet on Autistics Speaking Day

You would think that, at this point, disclosing my autism would be no big deal. After all, anyone can find out I’m autistic by doing a quick Google search on my name, reading my blog, or checking out the titles of my books.

But recently, the issue of disclosure has come up, and I’m finding myself approaching it rather differently than usual.

As many of you know, I’ve recently begun a master’s program in History and Culture at Union Institute and University. The program is entirely online, and for each course, my fellow students and I discuss our work through a discussion forum on the Union website. I’ve been talking about my interest in the autism and empathy issue, about different ways to approach the issue, and about the challenges of reading research papers that, for all of their attempts at neutrality, put autistic people in a painfully dehumanizing light. So I’m making no secret of my interests. But I haven’t yet mentioned the fact that I’m autistic — not even after a fellow classmate told me about her godson who is on the spectrum and her desire to find ways to help and support him. In the past, I’d have run right in and said, “I’m on the spectrum. You might get a lot out of reading my blog. And feel free to ask me any questions you want!” I did refer her to the Autism and Empathy site. And when I did, my professor looked at the site and my blog, and responded very enthusiastically to both. So I’m not hiding, by any means. I’m just not being as blazingly direct as usual.

At first, I thought that it was just disclosure fatigue. After all, I’ve been writing on the subject of autism and disability rights for nearly three years, and I’m feeling rather private right now. And then, of course, fear was rearing its ugly head — fear that if I disclosed my autism, my fellow students would think that I’m an unemotional, unempathetic robot more interested in objects than people. And yes, I could disabuse anyone of that notion by referring them to my blog, or to the Autism and Empathy site, or to my books, or to my husband, or to my daughter, or to my friends, or to my neighbors, or to my employers, or to pretty much anyone who has ever known me, but the stigma that attaches to autism is still there, and I know it. Usually, I am quite pleased to fight against that stigma, but in the context of my online courses, I’ve found myself strangely hesitant.

Disclosure fatigue and stigma have definitely entered into my holding back. But something else is in play. It’s the feeling that I just do not want to run in and disclose my autism right away unless I consciously decide it’s necessary. It doesn’t mean I won’t disclose it. It just means that I don’t want to lead with it.

I think what I’m going through is very much akin to what my gay friends have mentioned regarding coming out. At first, a lot of them felt that they had to tell everyone up front that they were gay — both to show that they were proud of who they were, and to get any homophobic insanities out of the way. But then they came to handle it differently. Instead of announcing it up front, they just started letting it come up naturally, such as in conversations about partners, or social justice issues, or the like. So instead of leading with, “I’m gay,” they’d just say naturally in conversation things like, “My partner and I went up to the inn this weekend,” or “I started fighting for social justice causes way back when I came out and joined the gay rights movement.” After all, straight people don’t greet every new person with “Hi, I’m straight.” It just becomes apparent.

By the same token, neurotypical people do not show up in discussion forums and immediately announce the nature of their neurology. I don’t see any reason that I should either, unless I determine that it’s necessary, according to my own lights. And so far, I’m finding my new approach quite interesting.

The only really odd thing about holding back is that I’m noticing that my pronoun use is, shall we say, problematic? For instance, when I talk about autistic or otherwise disabled people, I say, “they” rather than “we.” There is a serious cognitive dissonance going on, because I’m basically referring to myself in the third person. I have a feeling that this dissonance alone will drive disclosure, but it will have to happen in its proper context.

So I wasn’t quite ready to participate in Autistics Speaking Day this year. I fully support it, of course, but I was in such a different place in my process that it was difficult to get into the gear of writing something for it. It will be interesting to see how I feel about the whole subject next year.

© 2011 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Share